Text Citation or Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame(s)
|
Strategies Used and
Resource
|
|
Engagement Example
|
|
This article can be used as a means to explore different
viewpoints and supporting evidence.
The article provides vocabulary and terms related to Biology.
This article covers an example of the Scientific Method for the
students.
|
Proposition/Support
Vocabulary/Definition
Concept/definition
|
Author says/I say
(Buehl)
|
The author says/I say strategy is a method to incorporate the
reader’s internal monologue with the article. In this case, comparing the author’s
viewpoint towards artificial sweeteners and the reader’s views or experiences
with artificial sweeteners. This strategy allows the reader to acknowledge what
the author is stating while finding common ground with the reader’s own
thoughts. This is incorporating the transactional theory of reading, which
involves the reader using personal experience to help understand a text.
I would use this strategy by first having a review of the
Scientific Method where students are asked to write down the steps of the
Scientific Method down and then identify aspects in the article that fit each
step as a warm up. This will be both to review of the Scientific Method and its
steps while also act as a preview of the article for the students. After the
warm up I will pass out blank templates of Author Says/I Say for the students
to fill out. We will come up an example “I wonder” question together as a
class. I will model what kind of questions I am looking for and how to come up
with the questions based on my thought process.
With this article, I will think out loud by saying, “This
article is about artificial sweeteners and our gut microbes based upon the
title. After reading the few paragraphs I’m being introduced to the background
information for the research. This makes me wonder what is the difference
between natural and artificial sweeteners so I will write that in under the “I
wonder” category. Now I will look at what the author says the two types of
sweeteners are in the text. I see that the author says artificial sweeteners
are non-caloric alternatives to natural sweeteners that still provide similar
taste so this goes under the “The author says” category. Next I will fill out
the “I say” category with what I thought artificial sweeteners are and then
finally I will make a conclusion in the “And so” category based upon what the
author said and what I said. I thought artificial sweeteners had a different
taste to them, but I never personally had them myself to know for sure so I
would write that under “I say.” My conclusion for the “And so” category would
be that I think the author is saying the general public thinks that there is no
downside to them and that the only difference is that artificial sweeteners
have no calories with the same taste as natural sweeteners.”
Once I finish modeling how to approach the text with the
chart I will let them start reading and completing the chart on their own. Then
to expose students to other thoughts and ideas, I will have them share with a
partner what things they wrote down for each category. If time permits, then I
will divide the class into two sides. Finally, I will have them write an exit
ticket summarizing what they wrote down in their Author Says/I Say chart. This
exit ticket is for me to check their understanding and look at their different
viewpoints/knowledge on the topic. The further expand on this topic I will have
the students do additional research at home at the pros and cons of artificial
sweeteners in order to do a debate next class where they have to use a text to
support any claims they make.
I like this strategy because it makes it easy to integrate my
own personal thoughts and ideas with the author’s ideas. By having the students
create “I wonder” questions while they are reading it makes them slow down and think
about what they are reading rather than speeding through it. If something
confuses them they can examine it then and there rather than taking note of it
and then moving on before going back. You can also modify this strategy for
your needs by providing the “I wonder” questions for lower level students or by
creating an additional chart for “My partner says” among others. It is
versatile enough to be adapted to different levels and abilities.
Example Author Says/I Say
I wonder…
|
The author says…
|
I say…
|
And so…
|
What is
the difference between natural and artificial sweeteners?
|
Artificial
sweeteners are non-caloric alternatives to natural sweeteners that still
provide similar taste.
|
I thought
artificial sweeteners had a different taste to them, but I never personally
had them myself to know for sure
|
I think
the author is saying the general public thinks that there is no downside to
them and that the only difference is that artificial sweeteners have no
calories with the same taste as natural sweeteners.
|
References
Buehl, D., (2014) Classroom
Strategies for Interactive Learning, 4th ed. International
Reading Association.
Ornes, Stephen (2014). Artificial
sweeteners may evict good gut microbes. Science
News for Students. Retrieved from
https://student.societyforscience.org/article/young-blood-elixir-youth
No comments:
Post a Comment